Trade could be a loser under new Home Affairs portfolio, expert warns

Trade could be a loser under new Home Affairs portfolio, expert warns article image

Australia’s multi-billion dollar trade industry could be in danger of “slipping off the national agenda” under the newly announced Home Affairs portfolio, a trade expert has warned.

Mr Andrew Hudson, a partner with Rigby Cooke Lawyers said the government should clarify where the Australian Border Force (ABF) will sit under new Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton.

The ABF plays a key trade policy and trade facilitation role in conjunction with the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (DIBP).

“This announcement comes just two years after the creation of ABF as part of the merger between the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service (Customs) and the Department of Immigration into the current DIBP,” Mr Hudson said.

“Although ABF is a separate statutory agency, the Federal Government is yet to clarify whether it will continue as part of DIBP or be shifted, and how this might impact the trade facilitation agenda.”

According to Mr Hudson, key trade players across the import and export supply chain will be watching closely to ensure the border security agenda does not overwhelm the trade facilitation agenda and a number of practical matters are addressed.

“Those currently dealing with the border agencies on a daily basis across trade matters face a number of preliminary issues and questions,” Mr Hudson said.

Focus on national security

“For example, the terms of the Trusted Trader and Known Consignor schemes conducted by the DIBP and the Office of Transport Security include significant input from the ABF.

“Furthermore, if the Home Affairs portfolio is focused on national security, is there an argument for the revenue collection and related enforcement measures to be shifted away from the ABF to another agency such as the ATO as occurred with excise matters?”

Mr Hudson said the ABF also has an increasingly important role in collecting anti-dumping and countervailing duties and enforcing anti-circumvention measures against those trying to avoid trade measures.

“If the agency is to be moved out of that area, there will be significant pressure on the Federal Government to ensure the trade remedies agenda is preserved and serviced, he said.AndrewHudson_Formal_high res

“We strongly recommend advanced engagement which preserves the vital trade facilitation agenda, and that these issues are worked out during the time before the new ‘super ministry’ is established.”

Andrew Hudson is a Partner with Rigby Cooke’s Litigation team, specialising in all areas of trade including international trade conventions, dispute resolution and arbitration, trade financing options, commodity and freight contracts. He is also a member of the International Trade Remedies Forum convened by the Anti-Dumping Commission (ADC) and a member of the board of directors of the Export Council of Australia (ECA) and the Food and Beverage Importers Association (FBIA).


Leave A Comment

Spinning icon Saving your comment, please wait...
Spinning icon Saving your comment, please wait...